Use of the @ Symbol

thenoobyorker:

For jdsagas who asked, “Just curious: why not use Latino? In Spanish, don’t groups containing members of both genders take the masculine by default?”

An explanation from lati-negros,

With the virtual uses and changing of language online it’s important we note how we are using the @ symbol in our name and in the things we are creating and writing. For many of you this is “common knowledge,” but the reality is that some folks have not ever really thought about why this symbol is important.

We think the @ symbol is important because it represents gender neutrality, gender inclusion, and disrupts the misogynistic ways language privileges men, masculinity, and things that are considered “male.”As many Latin@ scholars have stated and argued, especially Anzaldua, “Language is a male discourse” (p. 54, Borderlands/La Frontera). In the Spanish language, grammatically, if there is one man present in a room or area filled with women (a man of any age, a boy, a child, etc.) instead of using the “feminine” form of the language often using an “a” (i.e. una or nosotras) a masculine “o” is used (i.e. nosotros or the absence of the “a” such as un).

Utilizing the @ in this way challenges these grammatical “rules” that are embedded in a legacy of privileging men, masculinity and maleness. It is also part of a legacy that includes and recognizes our gender queer and trans* community members versus erasing them by constantly using a language embedded in a gender binary/dichotomy.

The @ is useful not only in discussing Latinidad, but also discussing how Blackness and African identity intersects as well. Often when we see terms discussing LatiNegr@s in various ways and using other self-identifiers they are still using a masculine version of “Afro” such as “Afro-Latin@”. This is a preference by some, and I’d like to argue this is also a way of privileging men and masculinity in the English language. Afr@Latin@ is a valid term and form to use when discussing our identities as well. Just as AfraLatina is valid. Why must the African in us also remain masculine?

The questions still exist of how to actually speak the @ sign and this has yet to really be resolved. How have others negotiated this?

(written by Bianca)

(via sinidentidades)

  1. peayeahknow reblogged this from homoarigato
  2. simpleandtall reblogged this from educationforliberation
  3. xicanita-voz reblogged this from xicanaxingona
  4. yourm0msjokes reblogged this from xicanaxingona
  5. zorrozapatistazootero reblogged this from xicanaxingona
  6. xpinchemalinchex reblogged this from xicanaxingona
  7. xicanaxingona reblogged this from lati-negros
  8. sidoniob reblogged this from latinosexuality
  9. racismschoolstorage reblogged this from racismschool
  10. tupacdied4oursins reblogged this from kadalkavithaigal
  11. iamchibchan reblogged this from larebelde
  12. coatlicuesserpentskirt reblogged this from reinadeariza
  13. reinadeariza reblogged this from larebelde and added:
    That one female who tried to say using the @ symbol was a disrespect our people, I hope she comes across this and isn’t...
  14. ravishing-rarrar reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  15. hoforvangogh reblogged this from yesysabella
  16. thetimesinbetween reblogged this from educationforliberation and added:
    important & interesting! …wonder if they’ll let me use this on papers when i’m studying abroad…. i’m guessing no.
  17. thatcomicbookgirl reblogged this from yamino
  18. bygoshbygolly reblogged this from alwaysfaithfulterriblelizard
  19. poeticdoxa reblogged this from educationforliberation